sir_guinglain

While I'm about it, for those curious to see what I thought of Steven Moffat's first Doctor Who Christmas special, my review from not long after broadcast is still online at This Way Up.

I've finally written up my review of The Day of the Doctor and it's been posted at The Doctor Who News Page's reviews section at the link below.

Soufflé, meringue or reinforced concrete? Time War, Gulf War, banking crashes and horrible history

No long-form review for another site from me this week, but instead a few words of praise for Mark Gatiss's best script for the programme since The Unquiet Dead, Douglas Mackinnon's best episode as director full stop, and a claustrophobic set which nevertheless allowed cast and camera to move around. The lighting was a character in itself, cold and blue, green and red and Martian by turns. There was of course a huge amount of programme-literacy and fan literacy, from the reference to the HADS (we all knew what had caused the TARDIS to disappear straightaway, I'm sure) to the expansion of Martian lore building on the little stated on screen in their four previous appearances. Mark Gatiss surely knew, too, of the expectations of fans back in 1983 that the impending Warriors of the Deep would feature the Ice Warriors, and now that the Cold War can't be projected into the distant future of the twenty-first century, here it is as a historical backdrop which efficiently gives form to the deftly-stroked but broad-brushed characters and gives fans of a certain vintage the reunion which they had longed for. Taking the armoured turtle shape of the Ice Warrior and deconstructing it to reveal (though not entirely) the fast, spindly Martian inside made minor acknowledgement to the Quatermass and the Pit Martians, but a greater debt to Alien. There was a clear debt to The Ice Warriors too; at war with the elements and the West, the submarine was besieged by ice and by its opposing power bloc and by the present temptation to bring destruction on the world.

The forty-five minute slot remains a minor problem; a few more minutes of reflection, development and tension would not have come amiss, though they were not missed as much as they were last week. Materialising the Doctor and Clara more in media res than is usual was an effective storytelling device; the Doctor explains and vindicates himself not by words or the rehearsal of actions but by his deeds even more urgently than before. As for the future, do Earth and humanity remain forfeit to the (former) inhabitants of Mars? Like its kin-story Dalek eight years ago, the demonstration of the capabilities of a single Ice Warrior argues the case for reacquaintance with the species as a whole in Doctor Who.

Officers and cars respond to urgent calls; or all calls, depending on how the TARDIS is feeling.

Anyway, my thoughts on the story will be appearing at the Doctor Who News Page reviews section, I hope, in the not-too-distant future. They are generally positive.

ETA: Here's the review: apologies for the lack of formatting and the use of 'St John' rather than the canonical 'Saint John'.

I'd noticed how recent publicity for the new series of Doctor Who has emphasised its historical settings, with leaks from the set over the last few months revealing that the nineteenth century seems to be visited several times. Just as Doctor Who in 2005 had borrowed imagery and themes from the contemporary aspirational working-class drama genre, in 2012/13 it was borrowing the clothes of the new strand of historical series. Now the blog of The Journal of Victorian Culture, no less, has weighed in with a look at The Snowmen as an item of current neo-Victorianism. Definitely worth a look.

My review is up at Doctor Who Reviews. I'm tempted to write a second piece dealing with the Doctor's character - and I didn't pick up on the issue of the Doctor carrying a gun at all (which has outraged Stuart Ian Burns), though should have noted that there was something vaguely disturbing about the Doctor's last finger-pistol fight with Dockery. Dalek nanogenes? Compromised by the Angels? Cynical characterisation? Hm.

Everything I had to say (on first viewing) can be found here:

Doctor Who Reviews: Dinosaurs on a Spaceship (review 2)